SØG - mellem flere end 8 millioner bøger:
Viser: Grandstanding - The Use and Abuse of Moral Talk
Grandstanding Vital Source e-bog
Justin Tosi og Brandon Warmke
(2020)
Oxford University Press
265,00 kr.
Leveres umiddelbart efter køb
Søgbar e-bog
Grandstanding Vital Source e-bog
Justin Tosi og Brandon Warmke
(2020)
Oxford University Press
354,00 kr.
Leveres umiddelbart efter køb
Grandstanding Vital Source e-bog
Justin Tosi og Brandon Warmke
(2020)
Oxford University Press
230,00 kr.
Leveres umiddelbart efter køb
Grandstanding
The Use and Abuse of Moral Talk
Justin Tosi og Brandon Warmke
(2020)
Sprog: Engelsk
Oxford University Press, Incorporated
524,00 kr.
ikke på lager, Bestil nu og få den leveret
om ca. 15 hverdage
om ca. 15 hverdage
Detaljer om varen
- Vital Source 365 day rentals (dynamic pages)
- Udgiver: Oxford University Press (April 2020)
- Forfattere: Justin Tosi og Brandon Warmke
- ISBN: 9780190900175R365
We are all guilty of it. We call people terrible names in conversation or online. We vilify those with whom we disagree, and make bolder claims than we could defend. We want to be seen as taking the moral high ground not just to make a point, or move a debate forward, but to look a certain way--incensed, or compassionate, or committed to a cause. We exaggerate. In other words, we grandstand. Nowhere is this more evident than in public discourse today, and especially as it plays out across the internet. To philosophers Justin Tosi and Brandon Warmke, who have written extensively about moral grandstanding, such one-upmanship is not just annoying, but dangerous. As politics gets more and more polarized, people on both sides of the spectrum move further and further apart when they let grandstanding get in the way of engaging one another. The pollution of our most urgent conversations with self-interest damages the very causes they are meant to forward. Drawing from work in psychology, economics, and political science, and along with contemporary examples spanning the political spectrum, the authors dive deeply into why and how we grandstand. Using the analytic tools of psychology and moral philosophy, they explain what drives us to behave in this way, and what we stand to lose by taking it too far. Most importantly, they show how, by avoiding grandstanding, we can re-build a public square worth participating in.
Licens varighed:
Bookshelf online: 365 dage fra købsdato.
Bookshelf appen: 365 dage fra købsdato.
Udgiveren oplyser at følgende begrænsninger er gældende for dette produkt:
Print: -1 sider kan printes ad gangen
Copy: højest -1 sider i alt kan kopieres (copy/paste)
Bookshelf online: 365 dage fra købsdato.
Bookshelf appen: 365 dage fra købsdato.
Udgiveren oplyser at følgende begrænsninger er gældende for dette produkt:
Print: -1 sider kan printes ad gangen
Copy: højest -1 sider i alt kan kopieres (copy/paste)
Detaljer om varen
- Vital Source searchable e-book (Reflowable pages)
- Udgiver: Oxford University Press (April 2020)
- Forfattere: Justin Tosi og Brandon Warmke
- ISBN: 9780190900175
We are all guilty of it. We call people terrible names in conversation or online. We vilify those with whom we disagree, and make bolder claims than we could defend. We want to be seen as taking the moral high ground not just to make a point, or move a debate forward, but to look a certain way--incensed, or compassionate, or committed to a cause. We exaggerate. In other words, we grandstand. Nowhere is this more evident than in public discourse today, and especially as it plays out across the internet. To philosophers Justin Tosi and Brandon Warmke, who have written extensively about moral grandstanding, such one-upmanship is not just annoying, but dangerous. As politics gets more and more polarized, people on both sides of the spectrum move further and further apart when they let grandstanding get in the way of engaging one another. The pollution of our most urgent conversations with self-interest damages the very causes they are meant to forward. Drawing from work in psychology, economics, and political science, and along with contemporary examples spanning the political spectrum, the authors dive deeply into why and how we grandstand. Using the analytic tools of psychology and moral philosophy, they explain what drives us to behave in this way, and what we stand to lose by taking it too far. Most importantly, they show how, by avoiding grandstanding, we can re-build a public square worth participating in.
Licens varighed:
Bookshelf online: 4 år fra købsdato.
Bookshelf appen: ubegrænset dage fra købsdato.
Udgiveren oplyser at følgende begrænsninger er gældende for dette produkt:
Print: -1 sider kan printes ad gangen
Copy: højest -1 sider i alt kan kopieres (copy/paste)
Bookshelf online: 4 år fra købsdato.
Bookshelf appen: ubegrænset dage fra købsdato.
Udgiveren oplyser at følgende begrænsninger er gældende for dette produkt:
Print: -1 sider kan printes ad gangen
Copy: højest -1 sider i alt kan kopieres (copy/paste)
Detaljer om varen
- Vital Source 180 day rentals (dynamic pages)
- Udgiver: Oxford University Press (April 2020)
- Forfattere: Justin Tosi og Brandon Warmke
- ISBN: 9780190900175R180
We are all guilty of it. We call people terrible names in conversation or online. We vilify those with whom we disagree, and make bolder claims than we could defend. We want to be seen as taking the moral high ground not just to make a point, or move a debate forward, but to look a certain way--incensed, or compassionate, or committed to a cause. We exaggerate. In other words, we grandstand. Nowhere is this more evident than in public discourse today, and especially as it plays out across the internet. To philosophers Justin Tosi and Brandon Warmke, who have written extensively about moral grandstanding, such one-upmanship is not just annoying, but dangerous. As politics gets more and more polarized, people on both sides of the spectrum move further and further apart when they let grandstanding get in the way of engaging one another. The pollution of our most urgent conversations with self-interest damages the very causes they are meant to forward. Drawing from work in psychology, economics, and political science, and along with contemporary examples spanning the political spectrum, the authors dive deeply into why and how we grandstand. Using the analytic tools of psychology and moral philosophy, they explain what drives us to behave in this way, and what we stand to lose by taking it too far. Most importantly, they show how, by avoiding grandstanding, we can re-build a public square worth participating in.
Licens varighed:
Bookshelf online: 180 dage fra købsdato.
Bookshelf appen: 180 dage fra købsdato.
Udgiveren oplyser at følgende begrænsninger er gældende for dette produkt:
Print: -1 sider kan printes ad gangen
Copy: højest -1 sider i alt kan kopieres (copy/paste)
Bookshelf online: 180 dage fra købsdato.
Bookshelf appen: 180 dage fra købsdato.
Udgiveren oplyser at følgende begrænsninger er gældende for dette produkt:
Print: -1 sider kan printes ad gangen
Copy: højest -1 sider i alt kan kopieres (copy/paste)
Detaljer om varen
- Hardback: 248 sider
- Udgiver: Oxford University Press, Incorporated (Juli 2020)
- Forfattere: Justin Tosi og Brandon Warmke
- ISBN: 9780190900151
We are all guilty of it. We call people terrible names in conversation or online. We vilify those with whom we disagree, and make bolder claims than we could defend. We want to be seen as taking the moral high ground not just to make a point, or move a debate forward, but to look a certain way - incensed, or compassionate, or committed to a cause. We exaggerate. In other words, we grandstand. Nowhere is this more evident than in public discourse today, and especially as it plays out across the internet. To philosophers Justin Tosi and Brandon Warmke, who have written extensively about moral grandstanding, such one-upmanship is not just annoying, but dangerous. As politics gets more and more polarized, people on both sides of the spectrum move further and further apart when they let grandstanding get in the way of engaging one another. The pollution of our most urgent conversations with self-interest damages the very causes they are meant to forward. Drawing from work in psychology, economics, and political science, and along with contemporary examples spanning the political spectrum, the authors dive deeply into why and how we grandstand. Using the analytic tools of psychology and moral philosophy, they explain what drives us to behave in this way, and what we stand to lose by taking it too far. Most importantly, they show how, by avoiding grandstanding, we can re-build a public square worth participating in.
Preface
1. Moral Talk Is Not Magic
2. What Is Moral Grandstanding?
3. Grandstanding: A Field Guide
4. The Social Costs of Grandstanding
5. Grandstanding and Respect
6. Would a Virtuous Person Grandstand?
7. Politics as Morality Pageant
8. What to Do About Grandstanding
1. Moral Talk Is Not Magic
2. What Is Moral Grandstanding?
3. Grandstanding: A Field Guide
4. The Social Costs of Grandstanding
5. Grandstanding and Respect
6. Would a Virtuous Person Grandstand?
7. Politics as Morality Pageant
8. What to Do About Grandstanding
De oplyste priser er inkl. moms
Butikker og åbningstid
Handler du som firma
Forretningsbetingelser
Porto og forsendelse
Data & cookiepolitik
Handler du som firma
Forretningsbetingelser
Porto og forsendelse
Data & cookiepolitik
Find pensumliste
FAQ for studerende
Pensumlistegaranti
Sortiment og levering
Kompendier(for undervisere)
FAQ for studerende
Pensumlistegaranti
Sortiment og levering
Kompendier(for undervisere)
Polyteknisk Boghandel og Forlag A/S - Anker Engelundsvej 1 - 2800 Lyngby
Tlf 77 42 43 44 - email poly@polyteknisk.dk - CVR 34072655 - Sydbank Reg: 6748 Konto 0001107927
Tlf 77 42 43 44 - email poly@polyteknisk.dk - CVR 34072655 - Sydbank Reg: 6748 Konto 0001107927